1. آذر، عادل، حبشی، نعمت (1396). ارائه الگوئی موثر برای حسابرسی بخش عمومی دیوان محاسبات جمهوری اسلامی ایران. دانش حسابرسی، 17 (66): 5-40.
2.
امانی، جواد، خضری آذر، محمودی، حجت (1391). معرفی مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مجذورات جزئی(PLS-PM) و کاربرد آن در پژوهش های رفتاری. مجله برخط دانش روان شناختی، 1(3): 23-64.
3. بنی مهد، بهمن و بیگی هرچگانی، ابراهیم (1391) ، رابطه بین ارزشهای فردی و نیات اخلاقی حسابرسان، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، (4) : 1-10.
4. حاجیها، زهره و راشکی گزمه، علی (1396)، رابطه اخلاق حسابداری با توان تصمیم گیری و رفتار مدیران، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری ، (2): 155-160.
5. حساس یگانه، یحیی و کاظم پور، احسان (1392)، رابطه سطح مهارت حسابرسان با حساسیت و قضاوت اخلاقی، فصلنامه پژوهشهای تجربی حسابداری ، (10): 53-70.
6. رضوی زاده نفیسه، نونهال نهر، علی اکبر (1395). تأثیر سرمایه فکری و برآیندهای محیطی بر رفتار‌اخلاقی حسابرسان. اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری. ۱۱ (2): 123-135.
7. ساریخانی، مهدی، ایزدی نیا، ناصر، دائی کریم زاده، سعید (1398). بررسی قصد گزارشگری تقلب با استفاده از تئوری رفتار برنامه‌ریزی شده و نقش تعدیل‌گری شدت اخلاقی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 6(1): 75-105.
8. سلیمانی، سمیه، شورورزی، محمدرضا، نوری توپکانلو، زهرا (1397). تأثیر تهدیدها بر استقلال حسابرسان. دانش حسابداری مالی، 5(3): 69-80.
9. صدری، مسیح اله، علی احمدی، سعید (1398). تاثیر فشار بودجه زمانی و فشار صاحبکار بر قضاوت حسابرس با تاکید بر هوش هیجانی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 6(3): 119-139.
10. عباس زاده محمدرضا، محمدی، جمال. (1393). بررسی عوامل موثر برافزایش استقلال حسابرسان دیوان محاسبات کشور. فصلنامه حسابداری مالی، 6 (21): 1-28.
11. کاشانی پور، محمد، کرمی، غلامرضا، خنیفر، حسین، شعبانی، کیوان (1398). بررسی قصد هشداردهی حسابرسان مستقل درباره خطاکاری: کاربرد نظریه رفتار برنامه‌ریزی شده. دوفصلنامه حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری، 4(8): 63-91.
12. گلدوست، مجید، طالب نیا، قدرت الله، اسماعیل زاده مقری، علی، رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون، رویایی، رمضانعلی (1397). ارزیابی تأثیر ادراک اخلاقی و شهود بر قضاوت اخلاقی حسابداران نسبت به هشداردهی تخلفات مالی در بخش عمومی. مجله علمی پژوهشی دانش حسابداری مالی، 5(3): 1-23.
13. ملکیان، اسفندیار، قربانی، هادی، صالح آبادی، مهری. (1397). تأثیر استقلال حسابرس بر ضعف کنترلهای داخلی پس از تصویب دستورالعمل کنترلهای داخلی. دانش حسابرسی. 18(73): 55-77.
14. مهرانی ساسان، ثقفی علی، موسی خانی محمد، سپاسی سحر (1390). عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی حسابداران رسمی ایران. اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری. ۶ (3): 6-12.
15. نمازی، محمد و ابراهیمی، فهیمه (1396)، بررسی تاثیر سازه های فردی و اجتماعی بر شدت اخلاقی ادراک شده توسط حسابداران، دو فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری ، 2(4): 97-121.
16. نقش بندی، نادر، حبیب طلب، فاطمه (1397). تأثیر جهت‌گیری اخلاقی بر فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی حسابرسان. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت و حسابداری، 4(3): 26-44.
1.Abas Zadeh, M., & Mohamadi, J. (2014). Investigating the effective factors on increasing the independence of auditors of Supreme Audit Court. Quarterly Financial Accounting, 6(21): 1-28. (in persian).
2.Amani, J., Khezri, A., & Mahmoodi, H. (2013). Introduction of structural equation modeling by PLS-PM method and its application in behavioral research. Online Journal of Psychological Science, 1(3), 23-64. (in persian).
3.Arnold, D. F., Dorminey, J. W., Neidermeyer, A. A. & Neidermeyer, P. E. (2013), ‘Internal and external auditor ethical decision making’, managerial Auditing Journal, 28(4): 300–22.
4.Arnold, V., Collier, P., Leech, S., & Sutton, S. (2001). The impact of political pressure on novice decision makers: are auditors qualified to make going concern judgements?,
Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 323-338.
5.Azar, A., & Habashi, N. (2018). Representation an effective model for auditing the public sector of the Supreme Audit Court of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Audit Science, 17(66), 5-40. (in persian).
6.Barnett T. & Valentine S. (2004), ‘Issue contingencies andmarketers’ recognition of ethical issues, ethical udgmentsand behavioral intentions’, Journal of Business Research, Vol.57, No. 4, pp. 338–46.
7.Barrainkua, I. & Espinosa-Pike, M. (2017), ‘New insights intounderreporting of time: the audit partner context’,Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(4), 494–514.
8.Bandura, A. (1986), ‘The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory’, Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4(3), 73–359.
9.Banimahd, B.,& B7eigi Harchegani, E. (2013). The relationship between personal values and ethical intentions of auditors. The Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 7(4), 1-10. (in persian).
10. Carey, J. (1970). “The Rise of the Accounting profession: To Responsibility and Authority”, 1937-1969, (New York).
11. Cianci, A. M. & Bierstaker, J. L. (2009), ‘The effect of performance feedback and client importance on auditors’self- and public-focused ethical judgments’, ManagerialAuditing Journal, 24(5), 74–455.
12. Chi, W., Huang, H. & Liao, Y. (2012), ‘The effect of auditor tenure and client importance on discretionary accruals – evidence from audit-partner based data in Taiwan’, available at: http://www.aaahq.org (accessed on 17 September 2010).
13. Cohen, J. R. Pant, L. W. & Sharp, D. J. (1995). An international comparison of moral constructs underlying auditors' ethical judgments. Research on Accounting Ethics, vol. 1,97-126.
14. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981), ‘Auditor size and audit quality’, Journalof Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 99-183.
15.
Espinosa-Pike, M., & Barrinkua, I. (2016). An exploratory study of the pressures and ethical dilemmas in the audit conflict, Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review 19(1), 10-20.
16. Farmer T, Rittenberg L, Trompeter G (1987). A investigation of the impact of economic and organization factors in auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 7(1): 1–14.
18. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991), Social Cognition (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. goldoost, M., talebnia., Esmaelzadeh mogharri, A., rahnamaye roodposhti, F., royaee, R. (2018). Evaluating the Effect of Ethical awareness and Intuition on the Ethical Judgment of Accounting Professionals Workers on the Whistle-blowing of Financial Violations in the Public Sector. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 5(3), 1-24. (in persian).
20. Hamzah Idris, M., Jamali, H., & Sjahruddin, H. (2019). Investigating the moderating role of knowledge: The relationship between auditor’s experience and ethical judgment.
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(2), 33-51.
22. Haron, H., Ismail, I. & Na, A. L. (2015). The effect of moral reasoning, exposure to ethics and perceived ethical climate on ethical judgment of auditors in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 8, No. 2, pp. 25–65.
23. Hunt AK, Lulseged A (2007). Client importance and non- Big 5 auditors reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(2): 212–248.
24. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI), (2019), Developing a Useful SAI Framework, International journal of government auditing, 40(2).
25. International Federation ofAccountants (IFAC), Code of ethics for professional accountants (revised 2011), available at:http://www.ifac.org.
26. Jezierski, J. (2010). SAI independence in practice – experiences from INTOSAI Regional Working Groups. Contributions and Results of the INTOSAI Conference, pp, 81-84.
27. Johari, R. J., Mohd. Sanusi, Z & Vincent K. Chang . (2017) , ’Effects of Auditors’ Ethical Orientation and Self-Interest Independence Threat on the Mediating Role of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making Process’ International Journal of Auditing , 21(32),38-58.
28. Johari, R. J., Mohd. Sanusi, Z., Abdul Rahman, R. & Omar, N. (2013), ‘Auditors’ independence, experience and ethical judgments: the case of Malaysia’, Journal of Business and Public Policy, 8(1), 19–100.
29. Jones, T. M. (1991), ‘Ethical decision making by individuals inorganizations: an issue-contingent model’, Academy ofManagement Review, 16(2), 366–95.
30. Karcher, J. N. (1996). Auditors’ ability to discern the presence of ethical problems. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(10), 50–1033.
31. Kazem Pour, E., & Hassas Yeghaneh, Y. (2013). Relation between auditors ‘expertise and ethical sensitiv ity and moral judgment. Empirical Research in Accounting, 3(2), 53-70. (in persian).
32. Kashanipour, M., Karami, G., Khanifar, H., & Shabani, K. (2020). Study of whistleblowing intention of independent auditors about misconduct: An Application of Theory of Planned Behavior. Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 4 (8), 63-91. (in persian).
33. Latan, Hengky., Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel., & Beatriz Lopes, Ana. (2017). Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3534-2
34. Leitsch, D. L. (2004). Differences in the perceptions of moral intensity in the moral decision process: An empirical examination of accounting students. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 23–313.
35. Malekian, E., Ghorbani, H., & Sale Abadi, M. (2019). The effect of auditor independence on the weakness of internal controls after the adoption of internal control guidelines. Journal of Audit Science, 18(73), 55-77. (in persian).
36. Mehrani, S., Saghafi, A., Musa Khani, M., & Sepasi, S. (2012). Factors Affecting the Ethical Decision Making of Iranian Certified Public Accountants. The Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 6(3), 6-12. (in persian).
37. Mautz R. and H .Sharaf, (1961).The Philosophy of Auditing. (American Accounting Association).
38. Martins, A.H. (2010). Central elements of and prerequisites for independent SAIs in the light of the lima declaration of Guidelines on Auditing Precepts and the Mexico declaration on SAI Independence. Contributions and Results of the INTOSAI Conference, pp, 63-67.
39. Moser, J. (2009). Responsibilities, Challenges and Contributions of INTOSAI and External Government Audit Institutions to enhance Transparency, Accountability and Good Governance. Contributions and Results of the INTOSAI Conference, pp, 13-18.
40. May, D. R. & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision-making: a review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation and intention. Business and Society, 41(1), 85–118.
41. Moores, T. T. & Chang, J. C. (2006). Ethical decision making in software piracy: initial development and test of a four component model. MIS Quarterly 30(1), 167–80.
42. Namazi, M., Ebrahimi, F. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Personal and Social Factors on the Perceived Moral Intensity by Accountants. Iranian Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2 (4), 97-121. (in persian).
43. Naghsh Bandi, N., & Habib Talab, Fateme. (2019). The Impact of ethical orientation on Auditors' ethical Decision Making Process. The Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 4(3), 26-44. (in persian).
44. Navaiseh, M.A., Navaiseh, M. (2015). The Effects of the Threats on the Auditor’s Independence. International Business Research, 8(8), 141-149.
45. Nelson M, Elliott J, Tarpley R (2002). Evidence from auditors about managers and auditors earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review, 77: 175–203.
46. Owghani, A, A., Hajiha, Z., Royaee, R., Vakilifard, H. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Ethical Ideology and the Threat of Self-Interest on Ethical Decision-Making of Auditors. International Journal of Ethics & Society (IJES), 1 (4) :20-14
47. Oxner. m. m. (2006). Is ethical judgment a dimension of auditor expertise. Edmonton,Alberta, phd Theisis. Edmonton alberta UN.
48. Ping Ye, Elizabeth, C., & Simnett, R. (2011). Threats to Auditor Independence: The Impact of Relationship and Economic Bonds. Journal of Practice & Theory: February 2011, 30, (1), 121-148.
50. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research andTheory, New York: Praeger.
51. sadri, M., aliahmadi, S. (2019). The Effect of Time Budget Pressure and Client Pressure on the Auditor's Judgment with Emphasis on Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(3), 119-139. (in persian).
52. Sarikhani, M., Izadinia, N., Daei-Karimzadeh, S. (2019). Investigating the Whistle-blowing Intentions Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Moderating Role of Moral Intensity. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(1), 75-105. (in persian).
53. Shafer,W. E., Morris, R. E.& Ketchland,A. A. (2001). Effects of personal values on auditors’ ethical decisions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14(3), 254–77.
54. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J. & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36 (3), 245–55.
55. soleimani, S., shorvarzi, M., noori tupkanloo, Z. (2018). The Effects of the Threats on the Auditor’s Independence. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 5(3), 69-80. (in persian).
56. Valentine, S. R. & Bateman, C. (2011). The impact of ethicalideologies, moral intensity and social context on sales basedethical reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 155–68.
57. Zakaria, M., Haron, H. & Ismail, I. (2010). Knowledge of ethics, perceived ethical problems and ethical judgments. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 8(1), 50–64.
)