• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Financial Accounting Knowledge

  1. Home
  2. Reputation and Charity, Signaling and Economic Hypotheses of Corporate Social Responsibility

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Guide for Authors

Terms and Conditions

Forms

Reputation and Charity, Signaling and Economic Hypotheses of Corporate Social Responsibility

    Authors

    • Muntaha Hussein Hussein 1
    • Mehdi Heydari 2
    • Parviz Piri 3

    1 Ph.D. of Accounting Student, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

    2 Associate Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management, ,Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

    3 Associate Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.30479/jfak.2024.20751.3228
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to investigate the existence of motivations related to charity, signaling, and economic hypotheses of social responsibility, as well as the role of reputation in creating these motivations, if any.
Method: This research is practical in terms of its purpose and falls under the category of descriptive-correlational research due to its examination of the relationship between variables. Based on the applied conditions and restrictions, the screened statistical sample consisted of 101 companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 1392 to 1401 and was tested using multivariate regression models.
Results: The results indicate that the participation of companies in social responsibility activities is driven by motivations other than charitable goals. The company's reputation has a positive and significant effect on optimal social responsibility, which includes economic motivations. It also has a negative and significant effect on deviations from optimal social responsibility.
Conclusion: Companies can perform better by implementing social responsibility activities driven by motives beyond benevolent goals. Companies with higher reputations engage in social responsibility activities with economic and profit goals. These reputable companies are less likely to send opportunistic signals through social responsibility, resulting in more optimal social responsibility aimed at economic goals, profit earning, and increasing the company's value.
Contribution: By examining three hypotheses of charity, economic, and signaling, this research aims to clarify the motivations of companies in carrying out social responsibility activities. It seeks to determine which of these hypotheses is most consistent with reality and how companies with high reputations exploit these activities. Conducting this research can enhance understanding in this area. The results can help company managers adopt better strategies for managing their reputation and social responsibility, and assist researchers in better understanding the relationship between corporate reputation and social responsibility activities.

Keywords

  • Reputation
  • Charity Hypothesis
  • Signaling Hypothesis
  • Economic Hypothesis
  • Corporate Social Responsibility

Main Subjects

  • Financial Accounting
  • XML
  • PDF 1.35 M
  • Extended Abstract
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Azhdari, A., Nazemi Ardakani, M., & Taqiyan Omani, E. (2023). Investigating the relationship between corporate reputation, employer branding, and corporate social responsibility. Experimental Accounting Research, 13(4), 221-244. (In Persian).
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.
Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga, C. (2014). Accounting and accountability in the media: The role of corporate governance. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10(3), 349-362.
Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of management studies, 43(3), 435-455.
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325-1343.
Campbell, J., 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag.
Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International journal of management reviews, 7(2), 91-109.
Cochran, P., Wood, R., 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Acad. Manag. J. 27, 42–56.
Daneshi, Y., & Esmaeilzadeh, A. (2023). The effect of enterprise risk management quality and audit committee characteristics on corporate reputation. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 14(54), 207-232. (In Persian).
Deegan, C. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2302-2322.
Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091-1112.
Deng, X., Kang, J.-K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87–109.
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640.
Escamilla‐Solano, S., Fernández‐Portillo, A., Sánchez‐Escobedo, M. C., & Orden‐Cruz, C. (2024). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: Mediating effects of the economic dimension on firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 709-718.
Faraji, O., Janati Daryakenari, F., Mansouri, K., & Younesi Moti, F. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: The moderating role of earnings management. Scientific Journal, 7, 25-58. (In Persian).
Fombrun, C., & Van Riel, C. (2004). Fame and fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Frankel, R. M., & Li, X. (2004). Debt financing and firm reputation: The role of financial disclosure. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 408-431.
Geos, E., & Lodhi, R. (2024). Corporate Reputation and Organizational Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 345-360.
Griffin, J., Mahon, J., 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus.Soc. 36, 5–31.
Hessas Yeganeh, Y., & Salimi, M. J. (2011). A model for corporate governance ranking in Iran. Financial Accounting Research, 8(30), 1-35. (In Persian).
Jabbar Abd Ali Al-Utbi, S., Zowari Rezai, A., Chalaki, P., & Piri, P. (2024). The impact of restatement of financial statements on the quality and disclosure of voluntary CSR reporting in listed companies. Valuation and Behavioral Accounting Biannual Journal, 8(16), 40-60. (In Persian).
Javed, M., Rashid, M. A., Hussain, G., Ali, H. Y. (2019). The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1395-1409.
Johnson, R., Greening, D., 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. J. 42, 564–576.
Karpoff, J., Lott, J., Wehrly, E., 2005. The reputational penalties for environmental violations: empirical evidence. J. Law Econ. 48, 653–675.
Khodayari, F., Totian, S., & Alipanahi, M. (2018). The impact of organizational reputation on customer behavior in Alborz Insurance Company. Modern Management Engineering Quarterly, 7(1), 106-118. (In Persian).
Lopatta, K., Canitz, F., & Tideman, S. A. (2024). Abnormal CSR and financial performance. European Accounting Review, 33(1), 49-75.
Lovett, M. J., & MacDonald, G. (2005). How does advertising affect corporate reputation? Marketing Science, 24(6), 839-854.
Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of accounting and economics, 60(1), 56-72.
Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2014). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies, 28(2).
Melo, T., & Garrido-Morgado, A. (2006). Corporate Reputation: A Combination of Social Responsibility and Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), 145-156.
Mentor, Marly, "The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance" (2016). Honors Undergraduate Theses. 47.
Mishra, Dev R., Sadok El Ghoul., Omran Guedhami., Chuk C. Y. Kwok. (2011). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, Issue 9, pp. 2388-2406.
Nazarian, R., & Amiri Henzeh, F. (2023). The mediating role of corporate reputation in the relationship between CSR disclosure and firm performance. Journal of Modern Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 7(24), 1319-1336. (In Persian).
Orlitzky, M., Benjamin, J., 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: a metaanalytic review. Bus. Soc. 40, 369–396.
Porter, M. E. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-69.
Preston, L., O'Bannon, D., 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relation: a typology and analysis. Bus. Soc. 36, 419–429.
Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
Sameer, I. (2021). Impact of corporate social responsibility on organization’s financial performance: evidence from Maldives public limited companies. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 29.
Siddiqui, F., YuSheng, K., & Tajeddini, K. (2023). The role of corporate governance and reputation in the disclosure of corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Heliyon, 9(5).
Spencer, B., Taylor, G., 1987. A within and between analysis of the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Akron Bus. Econ. Rev. 18, 7–18.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Tahmasbi Khourneh, S., Ivani, F., & Ardeshiri, M. J. (2021). Investigating the reciprocal relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance using simultaneous equations systems. Management Research in Iran, 22(1), 119-141. (In Persian).
Wu, M., 2006. Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Acad. Bus. 8, 163–171.
 
    • Article View: 249
    • PDF Download: 249
Financial Accounting Knowledge
Volume 11, Issue 3 - Serial Number 42
September 2024
Pages 161-182
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.35 M
  • Extended Abstract
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 249
  • PDF Download: 249

APA

Hussein Hussein, M. , Heydari, M. and Piri, P. (2024). Reputation and Charity, Signaling and Economic Hypotheses of Corporate Social Responsibility. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 11(3), 161-182. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2024.20751.3228

MLA

Hussein Hussein, M. , , Heydari, M. , and Piri, P. . "Reputation and Charity, Signaling and Economic Hypotheses of Corporate Social Responsibility", Financial Accounting Knowledge, 11, 3, 2024, 161-182. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2024.20751.3228

HARVARD

Hussein Hussein, M., Heydari, M., Piri, P. (2024). 'Reputation and Charity, Signaling and Economic Hypotheses of Corporate Social Responsibility', Financial Accounting Knowledge, 11(3), pp. 161-182. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2024.20751.3228

CHICAGO

M. Hussein Hussein , M. Heydari and P. Piri, "Reputation and Charity, Signaling and Economic Hypotheses of Corporate Social Responsibility," Financial Accounting Knowledge, 11 3 (2024): 161-182, doi: 10.30479/jfak.2024.20751.3228

VANCOUVER

Hussein Hussein, M., Heydari, M., Piri, P. Reputation and Charity, Signaling and Economic Hypotheses of Corporate Social Responsibility. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 2024; 11(3): 161-182. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2024.20751.3228

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Financial Accounting Knowledge, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) .

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb