• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Financial Accounting Knowledge

  1. Home
  2. Interaction of Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories in Explaining the Asymmetry of Cash Adjustment Speed

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Guide for Authors

Terms and Conditions

Forms

Interaction of Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories in Explaining the Asymmetry of Cash Adjustment Speed

    Authors

    • Abbas Aflatooni 1
    • Mohammad Khatiri 2
    • Hossein Shakori Nasab 3

    1 Department of Accounting, Bu-Ali Sina University of Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran

    2 Department of Accounting, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran

    3 M.A in Accounting, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.30479/jfak.2021.15013.2827
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Maintaining non-optimal amounts of cash has negative financial consequences for a firm. Therefore, managers target an optimal ratio for cash and strive to achieve that target. However, the speed of adjustment towards the target depends on the position of the actual cash ratio (higher or lower than the target) and the firm’s exposure to the financial deficit and surplus. The purpose of this study is to provide evidence for the asymmetry of adjustment speed.
Methods: In this research, using 3764 firm-years data from firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange during 2002-2019 in the form of an unbalanced panel data and using the dynamic panel data method with the system generalized method of moment (System-GMM), the research hypotheses have been tested.
Results: Findings show that compared with other firms, firms that hold cash above the target level or are in financial deficit, have a higher speed of adjustment. The supplementary results using difference generalized method of moment (Difference GMM), and a different definition to determine the financial deficit and surplus are consistent with the main findings
Conclusion: The results confirm that the cost of holding cash more than the target (in deficit firms) is more than the cost of maintaining cash less than the target (in surplus firms) and this causes firms that hold cash more than the target (in a state of financial deficit) to have a faster adjustment speed. The research findings which indicate a kind of asymmetry in cash adjustment speed reveal the interaction of Trade-off and Pecking order theories in explaining the above asymmetry.
Contribution: By providing empirical evidence, this study has tried to reveal the interaction between the Trade-off and Pecking order theories in explaining the above asymmetry. The research findings contribute to the literature and theories on cash holding.

Keywords

  • Cash Ratio
  • Adjustment Speed
  • Financial Deficit
  • Trade-Off Theory
  • Pecking Order Theory
  • XML
  • PDF 1.25 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277-297.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 57(1): 1-32.
Bates, T. W., Chang, C. H., & Chi, J. D. (2018). Why has the value of cash increased over time?. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA), 53(2): 749-787.
Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do US firms hold so much more cash than they used to?. The journal of finance, 64(5): 1985-2021.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1): 115-143.
Bugshan, A., Alnori, F., & Bakry, W. (2021). Shariah compliance and corporate cash holdings. Research in International Business and Finance, 56(1): 101-133.
Byoun, S. (2008). How and when do firms adjust their capital structures toward targets? The Journal of Finance, 63(6): 3069-3096.
Dastgir, M., Yosefi, A., & Imani, K. (2013). Speed of adjustment of cash and effective corporate factors on it. Journal of Accounting, Accountability and Society Interests, 3(3): 19-33. (In Persian)
Denis, D. J., & Sibilkov, V. (2010). Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1): 247-269.
Diaw, A. (2020). Corporate cash holdings in emerging markets. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(2): 139-148.
Dittmar, A., & Duchin, R. (2011). Dynamics of cash. Working paper, University of Michigan.
Eghdami, E., Meshki Miavaghi, M., Kheradyar, S., & Kordrostami, S. (2020). Investigating the moderating roles of systematic risk elements and corporate governance on the relationship between social responsibility and cash holdings. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(4): 135-156. (In Persian)
Fakhari, H., & Asadzadeh, A. (2018). The effect of leverage and free cash flow on the cash holding. Financial Management Strategy, 5(4): 1-23. (In Persian)
Faulkender, M., Flannery, M. J., Hankins, K. W., & Smith, J. M. (2012). Cash flows and leverage adjustments. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(3): 632-646.
Flannery, M. J., & Hankins, K. W. (2013). Estimating dynamic panel models in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 19(1): 1-19.
Foley, C. F., Hartzell, J. C., Titman, S., & Twite, G. (2007). Why do firms hold so much cash? A tax-based explanation. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3): 579-607.
Gao, H., Harford, J., & Li, K. (2013). Determinants of corporate cash policy: Insights from private firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3): 623-639.
Harford, J., Li, K., & Zhao, X. (2008). Corporate boards and the leverage and debt maturity choices. International Journal of Corporate Governance, 1(1): 3-27.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2): 323-329.
John, T. A. (1993). Accounting measures of corporate liquidity, leverage, and costs of financial distress. Financial Management, 22(3): 91-100.
Kamyabi, Y., Hasan nataj kordi, M., & Ebrahimi, J. (2020). The effect of growth opportunities, financial constraints, and financial distress on cash holding adjustment’s speed in small and medium sized companies. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(4): 99-131. (In Persian)
Keynes, J.M. (1936). The general theory of employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2): 209–223.
Matoufi, A., & Golchoubi, M. (2018). The effect of family ownership on speed of adjustment of cash holding: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 9(4): 61-82. (In Persian)
Mehrabanpour, M., Faraji, O., & Sajadpour, R. (2020). The mediating role of financial reporting quality on the relationship between financial statement comparability and cash holdings. Accounting and Auditing Review, 27(1): 132-153. (In Persian)
Meshki, M., Sanayeei Masuleh, M. (2016). The effect of deviation from the optimal level of cash holding on the marginal value of cash holding. Financial Management Strategy, 4(2): 103-120. (In Persian)
Miller, M.H., & Orr, D. (1966). A model of the demand for money by firms.The Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, 80(3): 413-435.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M.H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory ofinvestment. The American Economic Review, 48(3): 261-297.
Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3): 574-592.
Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1): 3-46.
Orlova, S. V., & Rao, R. P. (2018). Cash holdings speed of adjustment. International Review of Economics & Finance, 54(1): 1-14.
Orlova, S. V., & Sun, L. (2018). Institutional determinants of cash holdings speed of adjustment. Global Finance Journal, 37(1): 123-137.
Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2013). Is there a U.S. high cash holdings puzzle after the financial crisis? Working Paper, Ohio State University.
Ramesheh, M., & Soleimani amiri, G., & Eskandari, R. (2016). Speed of adjustment to target capital structure based on interaction between trade-off and pecking order theories in TSE. Empirical Research in Accounting, 6(2): 161-186. (In Persian)
Rezaei pitenoei, Y., & Safari gerayli, M. (2019). A model for association between social trust and cash holding: A test of agency and precautionary savings theories. Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 5(4): 49-68. (In Persian)
Shakeri, A., & Jahanshad, A. (2018). Optimum cash flow in company activity cycle (growth, maturity, and wane) to emphasize on the risk of financing and profitability. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 7(26): 83-94. (In Persian)
Siddiqua, G.A., ur Rehman, A., & Hussain, S. (2019). Asymmetric targeting of corporate cash holdings and financial constraints in Pakistani firms. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 26(1): 76-97.
Uyar, A., & Kuzey, C. (2014). Determinants of corporate cash holdings: evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Applied Economics, 46(9): 1035-1048.
Venkiteshwaran, V. (2011). Partial adjustment toward optimal cash holding levels. Review of Financial Economics, 20(3): 113-121.
Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1): 25-51.
Zhou, Q., Tan, K. J. K., Faff, R., & Zhu, Y. (2016). Deviation from target capital structure, cost of equity and speed of adjustment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39: 99-120.
 
    • Article View: 570
    • PDF Download: 514
Financial Accounting Knowledge
Volume 8, Issue 4 - Serial Number 31
January 2022
Pages 63-86
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.25 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 570
  • PDF Download: 514

APA

Aflatooni, A. , Khatiri, M. and Shakori Nasab, H. (2022). Interaction of Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories in Explaining the Asymmetry of Cash Adjustment Speed. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 8(4), 63-86. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2021.15013.2827

MLA

Aflatooni, A. , , Khatiri, M. , and Shakori Nasab, H. . "Interaction of Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories in Explaining the Asymmetry of Cash Adjustment Speed", Financial Accounting Knowledge, 8, 4, 2022, 63-86. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2021.15013.2827

HARVARD

Aflatooni, A., Khatiri, M., Shakori Nasab, H. (2022). 'Interaction of Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories in Explaining the Asymmetry of Cash Adjustment Speed', Financial Accounting Knowledge, 8(4), pp. 63-86. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2021.15013.2827

CHICAGO

A. Aflatooni , M. Khatiri and H. Shakori Nasab, "Interaction of Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories in Explaining the Asymmetry of Cash Adjustment Speed," Financial Accounting Knowledge, 8 4 (2022): 63-86, doi: 10.30479/jfak.2021.15013.2827

VANCOUVER

Aflatooni, A., Khatiri, M., Shakori Nasab, H. Interaction of Trade-Off and Pecking Order Theories in Explaining the Asymmetry of Cash Adjustment Speed. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 2022; 8(4): 63-86. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2021.15013.2827

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Financial Accounting Knowledge, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) .

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb