• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Financial Accounting Knowledge

  1. Home
  2. Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Guide for Authors

Terms and Conditions

Forms

Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models

    Authors

    • Saeid Emami Dehcheshmeh 1
    • vali khodadadi 2
    • Saeed Nasiri 3
    • Mehdi Basirat 4

    1 Ph. D. Student, Department of Accounting, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran,

    2 Chamran University

    3 Assistant Prof of Accounting, Islamic Azad, University of Ahvaz, Iran

    4 Assistant prof, Department of Economic, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.30479/jfak.2020.12799.2639
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Conditional conservatism is an integral part of the process of normal accruals that are not formulated in these models. This research aims, in accordance with Byzalov et al (2016), by controlling the asymmetric behavior of explanatory variables in accrual models, which is due to the observance of the principle of conditional conservatism by accountants, on the one hand, measure the change in the explanatory power of accrual models, on the other hand, examines the usefulness of the model developed by Byzalov and Basu (2016) in measuring conditional conservatism.
Method: The model of Allen et al (2013) was the basis and were collected data from 150 companies listed in Tehran stock Exchange in the period 2006 to 2017, and bad news indicators were added to the original modelstep by step. 
Results: Controlling current cash flow asymmetric effect to the initial accrual model in the first step and then taking into account the asymmetric cash flow effect of the before and the next year as well as the variable of sales growth and number of employees in the second stage and finally taking into account the cumulative effect of cash losses on selection as an indicator of bad news, they increased the explanatory power of the model step by step, and the Vuong test showed a significant increase.
Conclusions:The developed model of Byzalov and Basu (2016) has a higher explanatory power than the Alan et al. (2013) model and can be used to measure conditional conservatism in Iran.
Contribution: The present study provides a new insight about accruals by controlling the asymmetric effects of disaggregated bad news indicators on accruals, which is consistent with conditional conservatism, and offers a new model for measuring conditional conservatism and earnings management tests in Iran.

Keywords

  • Normal Accrual (Non- Discretionary)
  • Abnormal Accrual (Discretionary)
  • Conditional Conservatism
  • Matching Component
  • Growth Component
  • XML
  • PDF 1.18 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
.   Allen, E.J, C.R Larson and R.G. Sloan, (2013),Accrual Reversals, Earnings and Stock Returns, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(1), 113-129.
2.   Ball, R. and L. Shivakumar, (2005), Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.
3.   Ball, R. and L. Shivakumar. (2006) The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition, Journal of Accounting Research, 44(2),207-242.
4.   Ball, R., Shivakumar, L,(2008), Earnings quality at initial public offerings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(1), 324–349.
5.   Banker, R. D, Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2014). The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2): 221–242.
6.   Basu, S,(1997) ,The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(3):3-37.
7.   Bushman R, M. A. J. Smith and F. Zhang (2011). Investment Cash Flow Sensitivities Really Reflect Related Investment Decision, Working Paper, University of North Carolina.
8.   Byzalov, D, and S. Basu. (2016). Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models. Review of Accounting Studies,21(3): 859-897.
9.   Chiu Che-Wei, Po-Chang Chen and Yuqian Wang, (2019), Improving the estimation of discretionary accruals – the cycle approach, Journal of Finance and Accountancy, volume 25, 1-19.
10.  Christodoulou, D , and V. Sarafidis. (2008). The Econometrics of estimating unexpected accruals. Part de “ Sydney based multi-disciplinary research initiative methodological and empirical advances in financial analysis; 1-26.
11.  Dechow, P. and I. Dichev.( 2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 35-59.
12.  Fadakar. S.M, Faghani Makranin. Kh, Zabihi. A, (2019), Explaining a Model for Profit Management in Bankrupt Companies and Comparing It with the Modified Jones Model, Financial and Auditing Accounting Research, 11 (43), 153-176. (in Persian)
13.  Fairfield, P., Ramnath, S., & Yohn, T. L. (2009). Do industry-level analyses improve forecasts of financial performance?, Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1),147–178.
14.  Ghorbani A, (2019), The implications of piecewise linear process of normal accruals. quarterly financial accounting journal, 11 (42) :75-99. (in Persian)
15.  Ghorbani, A., Vadiei Noghabi, M. (2018). Algebraic and Empirical Models for Specification and Control of Characteristics Affecting Accrual-generating Process. Applied Research in Financial Reporting, 7(1), 7-42. (in Persian)
16.  Hope, O.K., Thomas, W.B., Vyas, D.,( 2013). Financial reporting quality of U.S. private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 88, 1715–1742.
17.  Jones, J. (1991). earnings Management during Import Relief investigation, Journal of Accounting Research ,29(2):193-228.
18.  Kang, S., and K. Sivarmakrishnan. (1995). Issues in testing earnings management and an instrumental variable approach. Journal of Accounting Research ,33(2): 353-367.
19.  Liu Siming Diane, Len Skerratt. (2019). Revisiting the accruals loss recognition model of conservatism: are public companies really superior to private companies?, Economics and Finance Working Paper Series, Brunel university London.
20.  Maleki. E, Ebrahimi. S.K, Jalali. F, (2019), The impact of corporate life cycle on the level of conservatism, Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 11(44), 59-78, (in Persian)
21.  McNichols, M. F. (2002). Discussion of: The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation error. The Accounting Review, 77(supplement), 61–69.
22.  Mehrani.K, Zamani.M, (2015), Investigating the Impact of Adding Operational Cash Flows and accrual to Jones and Modified Jones Models in Improving These Models, Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange, 8(32): 5-26. (in Persian)
23.  Moreira. J and peter F. Pope, (2007), piecewise linear accrual models: do they really control for the asymmetric recognition of gains and losses?, CEF.UP Working papers 0703, universide  Porto.
24.  Peek, E., Cuijpers, R., Buijink, W.(2010). Creditors’ and shareholders’ reporting demands in public versus private firms: evidence from Europe. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27, 49–91.
25.  Ramezan Ahmadi. M, Arman.S.A , Mazaheri.E, (2017), Discussing Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Conditional Conservatism using Ball, Kothari and Nikolayev Model, Accounting and Auditing Review, 24(1), 1-18. (in Persian)
26.  Ronen J. and V. Yaari ,(2008), Earnings Management: Emerging Insights in Theory, Practice, and Research" , Springer Science Business Media, LLC.
27.  Salehi.A, Salehi.B, (2015), A Review on the Measurement Models of the Earnings Management: Discretionary Accruals –based Models and Discretionary Revenues-based Model, Quarterly Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge. 4(16): 103-118. (in Persian)
28.  Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I:Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3),207–221.
 
 
 
    • Article View: 759
    • PDF Download: 636
Financial Accounting Knowledge
Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 25
September 2020
Pages 129-153
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.18 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 759
  • PDF Download: 636

APA

Emami Dehcheshmeh, S. , khodadadi, V. , Nasiri, S. and Basirat, M. (2020). Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 7(2), 129-153. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2020.12799.2639

MLA

Emami Dehcheshmeh, S. , , khodadadi, V. , , Nasiri, S. , and Basirat, M. . "Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models", Financial Accounting Knowledge, 7, 2, 2020, 129-153. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2020.12799.2639

HARVARD

Emami Dehcheshmeh, S., khodadadi, V., Nasiri, S., Basirat, M. (2020). 'Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models', Financial Accounting Knowledge, 7(2), pp. 129-153. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2020.12799.2639

CHICAGO

S. Emami Dehcheshmeh , V. khodadadi , S. Nasiri and M. Basirat, "Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models," Financial Accounting Knowledge, 7 2 (2020): 129-153, doi: 10.30479/jfak.2020.12799.2639

VANCOUVER

Emami Dehcheshmeh, S., khodadadi, V., Nasiri, S., Basirat, M. Conditional conservatism and disaggregated bad news indicators in accrual models. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 2020; 7(2): 129-153. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2020.12799.2639

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Financial Accounting Knowledge, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) .

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb