Authors
1
Professor, Accounting Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran,Iran.
2
Associate Professor, Accounting Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran ,Iran.
3
Accounting Department, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University,Tehran,Iran.
,
Document Type : Research Paper
Abstract
Many countries are implementing accrual based accounting standards in their public organizations. Current status and capacities should be considered realistically in order to succeed in implementation of these standards.
purpose: This research aims to study status of implementation of Audit Organization’s accounting standards in the public sector institutions of Islamic Republic of Iran and to determine the gap between status quo and desired situation.
Method: In this research, factors affecting implementation of accounting standards of public sectors were identified and expert opinion about them was asked through questionnaires given to experts working in public sector institutions. In the designed questionnaire experts were asked to assess current status of factors affecting implementation of Audit Organization’s accounting standards in the public sector institutions of our country by considering their importance. Received responses were analyzed using Fuzzy Delphi research method and appropriate statistical tests.
Findings: Research findings indicate that, according to consensus of experts, factors of affect on implementation of accounting standards of public sector in Iran are not implemented appropriately and in all cases there is a meaningful difference between status quo (what there is currently) and desired condition (what should be).
Conclusion: According to the research findings, public sector organizations can help to close the gap between current situation and desired situation and successful implementation of these standards by accurate planning and fixing weak points in implementation of accounting standards.
Raising Knowledge: findings of this research can help to identify weakness points and strength points in implementation of accounting standards and to determine needs of public sector institutions for successful planning and implementation of a transition process to new accounting system.
- ACCA. (2017). IPSAS Implementation: current status and challenges. Region: Global, Topic: Public sector, Date: 31 Oct. http://www.accaglobal.com.
- Ataie, M. (2010). Multi - criteria Fuzzy Decision Making. Shahrood, Shahrood University of Technology. (in Persian).
- Baghoomian, R. Naghdi, S. (2015). International Public Sector Accounting Standards: Challenges Facing Developing Countries. Auditor, Number 77: 122-114. )in Persian.(
- Babajani, J. (2010). Necessity of Developing Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards in the Public Sector and Challenges of its Processing. Auditor, Number 49: 68-83. (in Persian).
- Babajani, J. ShekarKhah, J. Ebrahimpour, Sh. (2018). A Model for Implementation of Audit Organization’s accounting standards in the public sector institutions of Islamic Republic of Iran. Financial Accounting Research. 10(4):1-20. (in Persian).
- Esmaeeli, M. (2015). Research Method with an Approach to Dissertation and Essay Writing. Tehran, Ati Negar. (in Persian).
- Geoffrey Tickell.(2010). Cash To Accrual Accounting: One Nation’s Dilemma. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA .International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(11): 71-78.
- Hosseinpour, D. Ghorbani Paji, A. (2017). Fffect of Human Resource Development Strategies on Organizational Effectiveness with Intermediary Role of Mutual Trust and Job Satisfaction among Employees in Sports and Youth Organization of Mazandaran. Strategic Management Research, 23(65):45-75. (in Persian).
- Habibi, A. Izadyar, S. Sarafrazi, A. (2014). Mult-criteria Fuzzy Decision Making. Tehran, Katibeh Gil. (in Persian).
- Habibi, A. Adanvar, M. (2017). Structural Equations Modelling and Factor Analysis (Applied Teaching of LISREL Software). Tehran, Publishing Organization Jihad University. (in Persian)
- Ijeoma. N.B &Oghoghomeh.T.(2014). Adoption of international public sector accounting standards in Nigeria: expectation, benefits and challenges. Journal of Investment And Management. 3(1): 21-29.
- IFAC. (2011). Transition to the Accrual Basis of Accounting: Guidance for Public Sector Entities, Third Edition. Study 14,January.
13. IFAC. (2003). Transition to the Accrual Basis of Accounting: Guidance for Public Sector Entities, Second Edition. Study 14, December.
- IFAC. (2006). The Road to Accrual Accounting in the United States of America. Information Paper, March.
- IFAC. (2000). Government Financial Reporting, Accounting Issues and Practices.Study 11, May.
- IPSASB. (2014). The Conceptual Framework for General Purpose Financial Reporting by Public Sector Entities. https://www.iaasb.org.
- International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (2011). Transition to Accrual Basis of Acconting: Guidance for Public Sector Entities. Translators: Rahmani, H. Shahrokhi, S. Tehran: Audit Organization, Managing standard Development, 2017. (in Persian)
- Johan, C. Christophe, V. Francesca, R. (2014). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting:an international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences,1-20.Ras .sagepub.com.
- Johan Ch, Christophe V, Francesca M, Natalia A, Philippe v.(2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: an international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1):158–177.
- Joe C,Suzanne, F, and D. (2016). International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department.International Monetary fund, Technical Notes And Manuals. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/tnm/2016/tnm1606.pdf
- Johan, Ch. Brecht, R. (2009). Impact of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Information Systems: A Comparative Study.Working Paper, Ghent University. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/987306 /file/ 1116466
- Kordestani, Gh. Rahimian, N. Shahrabi, Sh. (2016). Identifying Barriers of Transition to Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector. Accounting Knowledge Quarterly, 16(65):47-75. (in Persian)
- Le ,Thi .Nha ,Trang. March(2012). Application of IPSAS Standards to the Vietnamese Government Accounting and Financial Statements.University of Tampere, Master Program in Public Finance Management. http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/84298/gradu 6505.pdf
- Pwc.v. (2014). study to inform the impact assessment of EPSAS implementation.1 August . www.pwc.be.
- Oulasvirta, L. (2014). The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards of the IFAC. A critical case study, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Elsevier,25 (3): 272-285.
- Prof, H. Soedarto, SH. Tembalang, Kota Semarang.(2015). The key Success And Strategic Role of Accrual Based Accounting Implementation. Journal The Winners, September,16(2):142-151.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235412001347
- Ratifah, I & Mulyani, S, NS. (2015). Role of Culture in The Preparation Stage of The Implementation of Accrual Based Accounting. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom, ISSN 2348386:172-181. http://ijecm.co.uk/
- Rozadi, M. Raman, N. Rasid, M. & Kaziemah, S.(2014). Accrual Accounting in Malaysia: What We Should Learn from Others. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics, December, 1(2): 63-76.
- Safarzadeh, H. (2015). Determining Scope of the Public Sector, Approaches. Auditor, Number 76:78-82. (in Persian).
- 30. Tickell, R.(2010). Cash To Accrual Accounting: One Nation’s Dilemma. International Business & Economics Research Journal , November,9(11):71-78.
- Wu, Chih-Hung; Fang, Wen-Chang. (2011). Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers; Qual Quant, Vol, 45: 751-768.
32. Tzeng, G. H. Teng, J. Y.(1993). Transportation investment project selection with fuzzy multi objectives. Transportation planning and Technology, 17(2): 91-112.