• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Financial Accounting Knowledge

  1. Home
  2. Content Analysis of Financial Fraud Theories and Providing a Multi-dimension Meta-model of Fraud

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Guide for Authors

Terms and Conditions

Forms

Content Analysis of Financial Fraud Theories and Providing a Multi-dimension Meta-model of Fraud

    Authors

    • Mohammad Namazi 1
    • Somayyeh Hosseini-Nia 2

    1 Professor, Faculty of Economics, Management and Humanities, Accounting Department, Shiraz University,

    2 Ph.D. student, Faculty of Economics, Management and Humanities, Accounting Department, Shiraz University

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.30479/jfak.2019.8873.2189
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the evolution of financial fraud theories and presentation of the meta-model of fraud, which explains the financial and non-financial incentives for committing fraud in the form of different models. The problem of research includes the followings: What are the most important motives for committing fraud? Which fraud model can explain the motives for committing fraud in more detail? And what are the results of these models for accountants?
Methodology: This research uses content analysis and meta-analysis techniques for published researches related to fraud in time period of 1950-2017.
Findings: The findings of the study showed that important fraud model in the 1950s began with "fraud triangle ", which included three dimensions of pressure, opportunity and justification, and the financial problems, the weakness of internal control system, and the unfavorable situation of work were identified as a fraud motive. In the 1980s, personal characteristics and the work environment were identified, and then "person integrity" was introduced. In the 1990s, behavioral factors, especially reputation, subjective norms, and control over tendency, were identified as the motivating factor for managers. In the 2000s, the "individual capabilities" including intelligence, the position, and role of the individual were identified, and cultural and social dimensions were considered. Since 2010, there has been consideration to meta-models.
Conclusion: The provided mete-model of this study includes financial and non-financial dimensions and is divided into four general categories of conditions, situational, normative, and human intelligence; each of them can be analyzed in three levels: individual, organizational, and international.
Contribution: In this study, the components of fraud triangle and its four components (motivation / pressure, opportunity, orientation / justification and capability) are studied simultaneously and based on it, a comprehensive meta-model was presented.

Keywords

  • Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Diamond
  • Multi-dimension meta-Model
  • White-collar Crime and Financial Fraud
  • XML
  • PDF 1.45 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
  1. Agnew, R. (2012). Reflection on “A revised strain theory of delinquency”. Social forces, 91(1), 33-38.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50(2): 179-211. ‏Artz, K. W., & Brush, T. H. (2000). Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 41(4): 337-362.Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2012). Report to the nation on occupational fraud & abuse [interaktyvus]. Prieiga per internetą: http://www.acfe.com/rttn/rttn-2012.pdfAlbrecht, C. O. (2008). International fraud: A management perspective. ‏ Ph. D. Dissertation University Ramon Lull.Albrecht, W. S., K. R. Howe, and Romney, M. B. (1984). Deterring Fraud: The Internal Auditor’s Perspective. Altomonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors’ Research Foundation.Albrecht, W. S., C. C. Albrecht, and Albrecht, C. O. (2006). Fraud Examination. New York, NY: Thomson South-Western.Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-regulation. Academic Press. ‏Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74(5): 12-52. ‏Bressler, M. S., & Bressler, L. A. (2007). A model for prevention and detection of criminal activity impacting small business. The Entrepreneurial Executive. 12 (1), 23. ‏Boyle, D. M., DeZoort, F. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2015). The effect of alternative fraud model use on auditors’ fraud risk judgments. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 34(6): 578-596. ‏Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2005). Unethical and fraudulent financial reporting: applying the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethic. 60(2): 115-129. ‏Cieslewicz, J. (2010). The Fraud Square: Societal Influences on the Risk of Fraud. In American Accounting Association Annual Meeting (Vol. 31).‏Cieslewicz, J. K. (2012). The fraud model in international contexts: a call to include societal-level influences in the model. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting. 4(1): 214-254. ‏Coleman, J. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology. 93(2): 406-439.Cooper, D. J., Dacin, T., Palmer, D. A. (2013). Fraud in accounting, organizations and society: extending the boundaries of research. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 38 (2): 440–457.Cressey, D. R. (1950). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review. 15(6): 738-743.Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: The Social Psychology of Embezzlement. New York, NY: The Free Press.Doost, R. K. (1990). Accounting irregularities and computer fraud. National Public Accountant. 35(5): 36-39. ‏Donegan, J. J. and Ganon, M. W. (2008). Strain, differential association, and coercion: insights from the criminology literature on causes of accountant’s misconduct. Accounting and the Public Interest. 8 (1): 1-20.Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M. J., & Riley Jr, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education. 27(2): 555-579.Etemadi, H. and Abdoli, L. (1396). Audit Quality and Fraud in Financial Statements. Financial Accounting Knowledge. 4 (4): 23-43 (In Persian).Felson, M. (1986), “Linking Criminal Choices, Routine Activities, Informal Control and Criminal Outcomes”, in Cornish, D.B. and Clarke, R.V. (Eds), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, Criminal Justice Press, New York, NY.Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Gbegi, D. O., & Adebisi, J. F. (2013). The new fraud diamond model—how can it help forensic accountants in fraud investigation in Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Fiancé Research. 1(4): 129-138. ‏Goldman, P. (2010), Fraud in the Markets, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Hoftstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations. Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. Software of the Mind. London: Mc Iraw-Hill. ‏Huber, W. (2017). Forensic accounting, fraud theory, and the end of the fraud triangle. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research. 12(2).‏Jackson, R. W., Wood, C. M., & Zboja, J. J. (2013). The dissolution of ethical decision-making in organizations: a comprehensive review and model. Journal of Business Ethics. 116(2): 233-250. ‏Karpoff, J. M., Lee, D. S., & Martin, G. S. (2008). The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 43(3): 581-611.Khajavi, S. H. and Ebrahimi, M. (1397). Investigating the Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Fraud on the Financial Statements of the Companies Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange. Asset Management and Financing, 2 (12): 71-84 (In Persian).Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into practice, 16(2), 53-59.Koller, C. A., Patterson, L. A., & Scalf, E. B. (2014). When moral reasoning and ethics training fail: Reducing white collar crime through the control of opportunities for deviance. Notre Dame JL Ethics & Pub. Pol'y, 28 (2), 549-578.Kravitz, R. H. (2012). Auditors' responsibility for detecting fraud: Putting ethics and morality first. The CPA Journal, 82(6), 24-30.Kuhn, T. S. (1963). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Vol. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ‏Kranacher, M. J., Morris, B. W., Pearson, T. A., & Riley Jr, R. A. (2008). A model curriculum for education in fraud and forensic accounting. Issues in Accounting Education. 23(4): 505-519.Kranacher, M. J., R. A. Riley Jr., and J. T. Wells. (2011). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Mackevicius, J., & Giriunas, L. (2013). Transformational research of the fraud triangle. Ekonomika. 92(4): 150. ‏Marks, J. (2009). Playing Offense in a High-risk Environment. Crowe Horwath, New York.Namazi, M. and Rajabdorri, H. (1396). Investigating the Number and Content Analysis of Articles Related to Accounting Professional Ethics in Iran. Accounting Advances, 9 (1): 193-226 (In Persian).Omar, N. B., and Din,H. F. M. (2010). Fraud Diamond Risk Indicator: An Assessment of Its Importance and Usage. In Science and Social Research (CSSR), 2010 International Conference on IEEE, Pp. 607-612.PourHeydari, O. and Bazrafshan, S. (1391). Investigating the Effect of Individual Characteristics of Auditors on Determining the Importance of Fraud Risks. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 3 (1): 28-52 (In Persian).Rae, K., and Subramaniam,N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures: antecedents and moderating effect on organizational justice and employee fraud. Managerial Auditing Journal. 23(2): 104-124.Rahroyedastjerdi, A., Foroughi, D. and Kiyani, G. H. (1396). Assessing the Risk of Fraud by Managers Using Data Mining, Accounting Knowledge, 19 (1): 91-114 (In Persian).Randall, D. M. and Gibson, A. M. (1991), ‘Ethical decision making in the medical profession: an application of the theory of planned behavior’, Journal of BusinessEthics. 10 (2): 111–122.Ramamoorti, S. (2008). The psychology and sociology of fraud: integrating the behavioral sciences component into fraud and forensic accounting curricula. Issues in Accounting Education. 23(4): 521-533.Ramamoorti, S., D. Morrison, and J. W. Koletar. (2009). Bringing Freud to Fraud: Understanding the State of- Mind of the C-Level Suite/White Collar Offender Through ‘‘A-B-C’’ Analysis. Working Paper, Institute for Fraud Prevention.Raval, V. (2016). A disposition-based fraud model: Theoretical integration and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 150 (3): 741-763. ‏Rest, J. R., D. Narvaez, T. S. J., and M. J. Bebeau. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology. 91 (4): 644-659.Ross, B. (2010). What are the Requirements for Fraud? Lawyers.com. Retrieved from http://research.lawyers.com/blogs/archives/4184-what-are-the-requirements-for fraud.html.Sajadi, S. H. and Kazemi, T. (1395). A Comprehensive Fraudulent Financial Reporting Model in Iran by a Theoretical Approach, Empirical Accounting Research, 6 (21): 185-204 (In Persian).Sampson, R., Eck, J. E., & Dunham, J. (2010). Super controllers and crime prevention: A routine activity explanation of crime prevention success and failure. Security Journal, 23(1), 37-51. ‏Sedighikamal, L. (1392). Fraud in Financial Statements Based on the Report of the Association of Fraud Inspectors. Auditor, 65: 116-120 (In Persian).Singleton, T. W., Singleton, A. J., Bologna, J. and Lindquist,R. J. (2006). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.Smith M. (2017). Research Method in Accounting. London: Sage Publication Ltd.Sorunke, O. A. (2016). Personal ethics and fraudster motivation: the missing link in fraud triangle and fraud diamond theories. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 6(2): 159-165. ‏Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Desai, N., Jones, K. L., & Riley Jr, R. A. (2012). A synthesis of fraud-related research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 32(1): 287-321. ‏Von Lampe, K. (2005). “Organized Crime in Europe”, in Reichel, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice, Sage, London.Wolfe, D. T., and Hermanson, D. (2004). The fraud diamond: considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal
    • Article View: 2,049
    • PDF Download: 2,602
Financial Accounting Knowledge
Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 20
June 2019
Pages 1-36
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.45 M
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 2,049
  • PDF Download: 2,602

APA

Namazi, M. and Hosseini-Nia, S. (2019). Content Analysis of Financial Fraud Theories and Providing a Multi-dimension Meta-model of Fraud. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(1), 1-36. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2019.8873.2189

MLA

Namazi, M. , and Hosseini-Nia, S. . "Content Analysis of Financial Fraud Theories and Providing a Multi-dimension Meta-model of Fraud", Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6, 1, 2019, 1-36. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2019.8873.2189

HARVARD

Namazi, M., Hosseini-Nia, S. (2019). 'Content Analysis of Financial Fraud Theories and Providing a Multi-dimension Meta-model of Fraud', Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(1), pp. 1-36. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2019.8873.2189

CHICAGO

M. Namazi and S. Hosseini-Nia, "Content Analysis of Financial Fraud Theories and Providing a Multi-dimension Meta-model of Fraud," Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6 1 (2019): 1-36, doi: 10.30479/jfak.2019.8873.2189

VANCOUVER

Namazi, M., Hosseini-Nia, S. Content Analysis of Financial Fraud Theories and Providing a Multi-dimension Meta-model of Fraud. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 2019; 6(1): 1-36. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2019.8873.2189

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

Financial Accounting Knowledge, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) .

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb